Enumerators slated for census data collection in Katabi Town Council, Wakiso District, have sparked a controversy by refusing to commence their duties, citing discrepancies in their appointment letters. The issue centers around a misunderstanding regarding the facilitation and compensation for their work.
According to the disgruntled enumerators, they were assured of a daily payment of UGX 50,000 for their services. However, upon reviewing their appointment letters, they discovered that the specified amount was intended to cover the entirety of the 10-day data collection period.
The revelation has triggered frustration and dissatisfaction among the enumerators, who feel misled and undercompensated for their anticipated workload. Many expressed concerns over the financial implications of committing to a 10-day assignment without the promised daily payment.
In response to the escalating tensions, the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) has intervened to clarify the terms of the enumerator contracts. UBOS emphasized that the UGX 50,000 stipulated in the appointment letters is indeed intended as compensation for the entire duration of the data collection period, rather than a daily wage.
UBOS further clarified that the discrepancy arose due to a typographical error in the appointment letters and assured enumerators that they would receive the agreed-upon compensation for their services. Additionally, UBOS pledged to provide the necessary field equipment and support to facilitate a smooth and successful census data collection process.
Despite UBOS’ clarification and reassurances, some enumerators remain apprehensive and are calling for further transparency and accountability in the contracting process. They urge authorities to address the issue promptly to avoid any disruptions to the census data collection timeline.
The incident underscores the importance of clear and accurate communication in contractual agreements, particularly in sensitive operations such as census data collection. As stakeholders work towards resolving the dispute, the focus remains on ensuring fair compensation and effective facilitation for enumerators tasked with this critical responsibility.